MotiF:使用运动焦点损失使文本在图像动画中起作用

MotiF: Making Text Count in Image Animation with Motion Focal Loss

December 20, 2024
作者: Shijie Wang, Samaneh Azadi, Rohit Girdhar, Saketh Rambhatla, Chen Sun, Xi Yin
cs.AI

摘要

文本图像到视频(TI2V)生成旨在根据文本描述从图像生成视频,也被称为文本引导的图像动画。大多数现有方法在生成视频以与文本提示良好对齐时存在困难,特别是在指定运动时。为了克服这一局限性,我们引入了MotiF,这是一种简单而有效的方法,将模型的学习引导到具有更多运动的区域,从而改善文本对齐和运动生成。我们使用光流生成运动热图,并根据运动的强度加权损失。这一修改后的目标导致明显的改进,并补充了利用运动先验作为模型输入的现有方法。此外,由于缺乏用于评估TI2V生成的多样化基准,我们提出了TI2V Bench,这是一个包含320个图像文本对的数据集,用于进行稳健评估。我们提出了一个人类评估协议,要求注释者在选择两个视频之间的整体偏好后给出其理由。通过对TI2V Bench的全面评估,MotiF胜过九个开源模型,实现了72%的平均偏好。TI2V Bench发布在https://wang-sj16.github.io/motif/。
English
Text-Image-to-Video (TI2V) generation aims to generate a video from an image following a text description, which is also referred to as text-guided image animation. Most existing methods struggle to generate videos that align well with the text prompts, particularly when motion is specified. To overcome this limitation, we introduce MotiF, a simple yet effective approach that directs the model's learning to the regions with more motion, thereby improving the text alignment and motion generation. We use optical flow to generate a motion heatmap and weight the loss according to the intensity of the motion. This modified objective leads to noticeable improvements and complements existing methods that utilize motion priors as model inputs. Additionally, due to the lack of a diverse benchmark for evaluating TI2V generation, we propose TI2V Bench, a dataset consists of 320 image-text pairs for robust evaluation. We present a human evaluation protocol that asks the annotators to select an overall preference between two videos followed by their justifications. Through a comprehensive evaluation on TI2V Bench, MotiF outperforms nine open-sourced models, achieving an average preference of 72%. The TI2V Bench is released in https://wang-sj16.github.io/motif/.

Summary

AI-Generated Summary

Paper Overview

This literature focuses on Text-Image-to-Video (TI2V) generation, emphasizing text alignment and motion enhancement. The core contribution introduces MotiF, leveraging motion heatmaps and weighted loss to improve motion learning. The methodology includes a novel benchmark dataset, TI2V Bench, and human evaluation for performance assessment, showcasing MotiF's superiority over existing models.

Core Contribution

The key innovation lies in the introduction of MotiF, a method enhancing motion learning in TI2V generation by focusing on high-motion regions. This approach significantly improves text alignment and motion quality in video synthesis tasks.

Research Context

This research addresses the need for improved motion learning in TI2V generation, filling gaps in existing literature by proposing a novel method, MotiF, that outperforms previous models. The study positions itself as a significant advancement in text-guided video synthesis.

Keywords

Text-Image-to-Video (TI2V), Motion Focal Loss (MotiF), Optical Flow, Benchmark Dataset, Human Evaluation

Background

The research background entails the necessity to enhance training objectives for motion learning in denoising models during training. The study introduces a motion focal loss to emphasize high-motion regions, utilizes optical flow for motion heatmap generation, and incorporates image conditioning for improved model performance.

Research Gap

The specific gap addressed is the need for better motion learning in TI2V generation models, which the MotiF method effectively bridges by focusing on regions with more motion during training.

Technical Challenges

The technical obstacles include optimizing motion learning in video synthesis tasks, ensuring text alignment, and generating coherent motion based on text descriptions. The study overcomes these challenges through the innovative use of MotiF and optical flow techniques.

Prior Approaches

Existing solutions lacked effective methods for motion learning in TI2V generation. The introduction of MotiF and the utilization of optical flow represent significant advancements over prior techniques, showcasing improved text alignment and motion quality.

Methodology

The research methodology introduces MotiF, a motion focal loss method that directs the model's learning to high-motion regions using motion heatmaps. The technical architecture involves an encoder-decoder design for video generation, leveraging optical flow for motion heatmap generation, and incorporating latent video diffusion models (LVDMs) for computational efficiency.

Theoretical Foundation

MotiF is based on the concept of focusing on high-motion regions during training to enhance motion learning in video generation tasks. The use of optical flow and LVDMs provides a strong theoretical basis for improving text-guided video synthesis.

Technical Architecture

The system design includes an encoder-decoder architecture for video generation, with a focus on maintaining visual coherence with the starting image and generating motion based on text descriptions. The implementation details involve representing input videos as 4D tensors and using optical flow for motion heatmap generation.

Implementation Details

The implementation utilizes Motion Focal Loss (MotiF) to emphasize high-motion regions, ensuring better motion learning during video generation. Additionally, the model architecture incorporates image conditioning by concatenating image latent with video latents for improved performance.

Innovation Points

The study's innovation lies in the effective use of MotiF to enhance motion learning, the incorporation of optical flow for motion heatmap generation, and the utilization of LVDMs for reducing computational demands in video synthesis tasks.

Experimental Validation

The experimental validation involves comparing MotiF with prior methods, highlighting its effectiveness in motion learning. The setup includes training the model on a licensed dataset, optimizing with diffusion and motion focal losses, and conducting human evaluation for performance assessment.

Setup

The exact configurations involve training the model on a licensed dataset of video-text pairs, optimizing with diffusion and motion focal losses, and using a linear noise schedule for improved training objectives.

Metrics

The evaluation criteria include human assessment through A-B testing, comparing to existing benchmarks, and emphasizing the importance of human perception alignment in evaluating TI2V generation models.

Results

The quantitative and qualitative findings demonstrate that MotiF outperforms nine open-sourced models with an average preference of 72%, particularly excelling in text alignment and motion quality. Comparative analysis showcases the complementarity of MotiF with existing techniques in TI2V generation.

Comparative Analysis

Comparisons with prior methods reveal MotiF's superiority in enhancing text alignment and motion quality in TI2V generation. The study demonstrates the effectiveness of the motion focal loss and the chosen image conditioning method in improving model performance.

Impact and Implications

The research findings indicate the significant contributions of MotiF in improving motion learning and text alignment in TI2V generation. While the model shows advantages over prior works, limitations in generating high-quality videos in complex scenarios suggest future research directions.

Key Findings

The key contributions include the superior performance of MotiF in enhancing text alignment and motion quality, as well as its effectiveness in outperforming existing models in TI2V generation tasks.

Limitations

The study acknowledges limitations in generating high-quality videos in challenging scenarios with multiple objects, indicating areas for further improvement in future research.

Future Directions

Concrete research opportunities include refining the model for better performance in complex video synthesis scenarios, exploring advanced motion learning techniques, and addressing limitations to enhance overall video quality.

Practical Significance

The practical implications of this research include the potential application of MotiF in various real-world scenarios requiring text-guided video synthesis, such as content creation, video editing, and multimedia production.

热门论文

1比特LLM时代:所有大型语言模型均为1.58比特。
The Era of 1-bit LLMs: All Large Language Models are in 1.58 Bits

Shuming Ma, Hongyu Wang, Lingxiao Ma, Lei Wang, Wenhui Wang, Shaohan Huang, Li Dong, Ruiping Wang, Jilong Xue, Furu WeiFeb 27, 2024612142

DeepSeek-R1:通过强化学习激励LLMs中的推理能力
DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning

DeepSeek-AI, Daya Guo, Dejian Yang, Haowei Zhang, Junxiao Song, Ruoyu Zhang, Runxin Xu, Qihao Zhu, Shirong Ma, Peiyi Wang, Xiao Bi, Xiaokang Zhang, Xingkai Yu, Yu Wu, Z. F. Wu, Zhibin Gou, Zhihong Shao, Zhuoshu Li, Ziyi Gao, Aixin Liu, Bing Xue, Bingxuan Wang, Bochao Wu, Bei Feng, Chengda Lu, Chenggang Zhao, Chengqi Deng, Chenyu Zhang, Chong Ruan, Damai Dai, Deli Chen, Dongjie Ji, Erhang Li, Fangyun Lin, Fucong Dai, Fuli Luo, Guangbo Hao, Guanting Chen, Guowei Li, H. Zhang, Han Bao, Hanwei Xu, Haocheng Wang, Honghui Ding, Huajian Xin, Huazuo Gao, Hui Qu, Hui Li, Jianzhong Guo, Jiashi Li, Jiawei Wang, Jingchang Chen, Jingyang Yuan, Junjie Qiu, Junlong Li, J. L. Cai, Jiaqi Ni, Jian Liang, Jin Chen, Kai Dong, Kai Hu, Kaige Gao, Kang Guan, Kexin Huang, Kuai Yu, Lean Wang, Lecong Zhang, Liang Zhao, Litong Wang, Liyue Zhang, Lei Xu, Leyi Xia, Mingchuan Zhang, Minghua Zhang, Minghui Tang, Meng Li, Miaojun Wang, Mingming Li, Ning Tian, Panpan Huang, Peng Zhang, Qiancheng Wang, Qinyu Chen, Qiushi Du, Ruiqi Ge, Ruisong Zhang, Ruizhe Pan, Runji Wang, R. J. Chen, R. L. Jin, Ruyi Chen, Shanghao Lu, Shangyan Zhou, Shanhuang Chen, Shengfeng Ye, Shiyu Wang, Shuiping Yu, Shunfeng Zhou, Shuting Pan, S. S. Li, Shuang Zhou, Shaoqing Wu, Shengfeng Ye, Tao Yun, Tian Pei, Tianyu Sun, T. Wang, Wangding Zeng, Wanjia Zhao, Wen Liu, Wenfeng Liang, Wenjun Gao, Wenqin Yu, Wentao Zhang, W. L. Xiao, Wei An, Xiaodong Liu, Xiaohan Wang, Xiaokang Chen, Xiaotao Nie, Xin Cheng, Xin Liu, Xin Xie, Xingchao Liu, Xinyu Yang, Xinyuan Li, Xuecheng Su, Xuheng Lin, X. Q. Li, Xiangyue Jin, Xiaojin Shen, Xiaosha Chen, Xiaowen Sun, Xiaoxiang Wang, Xinnan Song, Xinyi Zhou, Xianzu Wang, Xinxia Shan, Y. K. Li, Y. Q. Wang, Y. X. Wei, Yang Zhang, Yanhong Xu, Yao Li, Yao Zhao, Yaofeng Sun, Yaohui Wang, Yi Yu, Yichao Zhang, Yifan Shi, Yiliang Xiong, Ying He, Yishi Piao, Yisong Wang, Yixuan Tan, Yiyang Ma, Yiyuan Liu, Yongqiang Guo, Yuan Ou, Yuduan Wang, Yue Gong, Yuheng Zou, Yujia He, Yunfan Xiong, Yuxiang Luo, Yuxiang You, Yuxuan Liu, Yuyang Zhou, Y. X. Zhu, Yanhong Xu, Yanping Huang, Yaohui Li, Yi Zheng, Yuchen Zhu, Yunxian Ma, Ying Tang, Yukun Zha, Yuting Yan, Z. Z. Ren, Zehui Ren, Zhangli Sha, Zhe Fu, Zhean Xu, Zhenda Xie, Zhengyan Zhang, Zhewen Hao, Zhicheng Ma, Zhigang Yan, Zhiyu Wu, Zihui Gu, Zijia Zhu, Zijun Liu, Zilin Li, Ziwei Xie, Ziyang Song, Zizheng Pan, Zhen Huang, Zhipeng Xu, Zhongyu Zhang, Zhen ZhangJan 22, 20253735

Qwen2.5 技术报告
Qwen2.5 Technical Report

Qwen, An Yang, Baosong Yang, Beichen Zhang, Binyuan Hui, Bo Zheng, Bowen Yu, Chengyuan Li, Dayiheng Liu, Fei Huang, Haoran Wei, Huan Lin, Jian Yang, Jianhong Tu, Jianwei Zhang, Jianxin Yang, Jiaxi Yang, Jingren Zhou, Junyang Lin, Kai Dang, Keming Lu, Keqin Bao, Kexin Yang, Le Yu, Mei Li, Mingfeng Xue, Pei Zhang, Qin Zhu, Rui Men, Runji Lin, Tianhao Li, Tingyu Xia, Xingzhang Ren, Xuancheng Ren, Yang Fan, Yang Su, Yichang Zhang, Yu Wan, Yuqiong Liu, Zeyu Cui, Zhenru Zhang, Zihan QiuDec 19, 202436311

PDF62December 25, 2024