Generazione di Controfattuali da Modelli Linguistici

Counterfactual Generation from Language Models

November 11, 2024
Autori: Shauli Ravfogel, Anej Svete, Vésteinn Snæbjarnarson, Ryan Cotterell
cs.AI

Abstract

Comprendere e manipolare i meccanismi di generazione causale nei modelli linguistici è essenziale per controllarne il comportamento. Lavori precedenti si sono basati principalmente su tecniche come la chirurgia della rappresentazione - ad esempio, ablazioni del modello o manipolazione di sottospazi lineari legati a concetti specifici - per intervenire su questi modelli. Per comprendere con precisione l'impatto delle interventi, è utile esaminare i controfattuali - ad esempio, come sarebbe apparsa una data frase se fosse stata generata dal modello seguendo un intervento specifico. Sottolineiamo che il ragionamento controfattuale è concettualmente distinto dagli interventi, come articolato nella gerarchia causale di Pearl. Sulla base di questa osservazione, proponiamo un framework per generare veri controfattuali di stringhe riformulando i modelli linguistici come Modelli di Equazioni Strutturali Generalizzate utilizzando il trucco Gumbel-max. Ciò ci consente di modellare la distribuzione congiunta su stringhe originali e i loro controfattuali risultanti dalla stessa istanziazione del rumore di campionamento. Sviluppiamo un algoritmo basato sul campionamento Gumbel a posteriori che ci permette di inferire le variabili latenti di rumore e generare controfattuali di stringhe osservate. I nostri esperimenti dimostrano che l'approccio produce controfattuali significativi mostrando al contempo che le tecniche di intervento comunemente utilizzate hanno considerevoli effetti collaterali indesiderati.
English
Understanding and manipulating the causal generation mechanisms in language models is essential for controlling their behavior. Previous work has primarily relied on techniques such as representation surgery -- e.g., model ablations or manipulation of linear subspaces tied to specific concepts -- to intervene on these models. To understand the impact of interventions precisely, it is useful to examine counterfactuals -- e.g., how a given sentence would have appeared had it been generated by the model following a specific intervention. We highlight that counterfactual reasoning is conceptually distinct from interventions, as articulated in Pearl's causal hierarchy. Based on this observation, we propose a framework for generating true string counterfactuals by reformulating language models as Generalized Structural-equation. Models using the Gumbel-max trick. This allows us to model the joint distribution over original strings and their counterfactuals resulting from the same instantiation of the sampling noise. We develop an algorithm based on hindsight Gumbel sampling that allows us to infer the latent noise variables and generate counterfactuals of observed strings. Our experiments demonstrate that the approach produces meaningful counterfactuals while at the same time showing that commonly used intervention techniques have considerable undesired side effects.

Summary

AI-Generated Summary

Paper Overview

The paper delves into probing neural representations in language models for interpretation, focusing on causal importance and true counterfactual generation. It introduces a framework using Generalized Structural-equation Models with the Gumbel-max trick to alter pronouns in biographies significantly. The study emphasizes the challenges of achieving precise interventions in language models and highlights unintended semantic shifts induced by interventions.

Core Contribution

The key innovation lies in reformulating Language Models (LMs) as Generalized Structural-equation Models to generate true counterfactuals, showcasing the impact of interventions on language model outputs and semantic shifts induced by alterations.

Research Context

The research positions itself within the domain of natural language processing and causal inference, addressing the need for refined methods to achieve targeted modifications in language models while minimizing unintended changes.

Keywords

  • Neural representations
  • Language models
  • Counterfactual generation
  • Generalized Structural-equation Models
  • Gumbel-max trick

Background

The research background focuses on the shift towards investigating causal importance in language models, categorizing prior works into concept-focused and component-focused studies. These studies aim to neutralize specific concepts' influence and understand specific layers or modules' roles within the network, aligning with Pearl's causal hierarchy.

Research Gap

Existing literature lacks precise methods for generating true counterfactuals in language models and struggles with achieving isolated interventions without collateral changes.

Technical Challenges

Technical obstacles include the need for refined methods to achieve targeted modifications in language models, challenges in altering pronouns precisely, and unintended semantic shifts induced by interventions.

Prior Approaches

Previous research utilized representation surgery and interventions in language models but lacked the precision of true counterfactual generation. The study introduces a novel framework using Generalized Structural-equation Models for this purpose.

Methodology

The research methodology involves reformulating Language Models as Generalized Structural-equation Models with the Gumbel-max trick to generate true counterfactuals. An algorithm based on hindsight Gumbel sampling is developed for inferring latent noise variables and altering observed strings.

Theoretical Foundation

Language Models are framed as Generalized Structural-equation Models, allowing for precise interventions and counterfactual generation by disentangling stochastic and deterministic aspects of text generation.

Technical Architecture

The study utilizes the Gumbel-max trick for sampling from categorical distributions and proposes a conditional counterfactual generation algorithm for altering model outputs based on interventions.

Implementation Details

Experiments involve MEMIT, steering techniques, and instruction-finetuning for knowledge editing and evaluating the impact of interventions on language model outputs.

Innovation Points

The key technical advantage lies in the precise generation of true counterfactuals in language models, showcasing the impact of interventions on model behavior and semantic shifts induced by alterations.

Experimental Validation

The experimental validation includes altering pronouns in biographies and locations in sentences to generate counterfactuals, quantifying the effects of interventions, and evaluating semantic shifts induced by alterations.

Setup

The experiments involve inducing counterfactual models using MEMIT, steering techniques, and instruction-finetuning, evaluating the impact of interventions on model outputs.

Metrics

Evaluation metrics include measuring the log ratio of probabilities of words in original and counterfactual texts, assessing semantic drift using cosine similarity, and analyzing the impact of interventions on model behavior.

Results

Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework in generating true counterfactuals, showcasing significant shifts induced by interventions and unintended semantic changes in model outputs.

Comparative Analysis

Comparisons with prior intervention techniques like MEMIT and steering interventions highlight the precision and impact of different methods on altering language model behavior.

Impact and Implications

The study's key findings emphasize the importance of precise interventions in language models, the challenges in achieving targeted modifications, and the unintended semantic shifts induced by alterations.

Key Findings

The research showcases the impact of interventions on language model outputs, quantifies the effects of alterations, and highlights the need for refined methods to achieve precise modifications.

Limitations

The study acknowledges challenges in achieving isolated interventions in language models and the potential for unintended semantic shifts induced by alterations.

Future Directions

Concrete research opportunities include developing more refined methods for targeted modifications in language models, exploring the causal influences in language generation further, and mitigating unintended semantic shifts induced by interventions.

Practical Significance

The practical applications of the research lie in understanding and manipulating causal generation mechanisms in language models, enabling precise interventions for altering model behavior and outputs.

Articoli in Evidenza

L'Era degli LLM a 1 bit: Tutti i Modelli Linguistici di Grande Dimensione sono in 1,58 Bit
The Era of 1-bit LLMs: All Large Language Models are in 1.58 Bits

Shuming Ma, Hongyu Wang, Lingxiao Ma, Lei Wang, Wenhui Wang, Shaohan Huang, Li Dong, Ruiping Wang, Jilong Xue, Furu WeiFeb 27, 2024615143

DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizzare la capacità di ragionamento nei LLM tramite Apprendimento per Rinforzo
DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning

DeepSeek-AI, Daya Guo, Dejian Yang, Haowei Zhang, Junxiao Song, Ruoyu Zhang, Runxin Xu, Qihao Zhu, Shirong Ma, Peiyi Wang, Xiao Bi, Xiaokang Zhang, Xingkai Yu, Yu Wu, Z. F. Wu, Zhibin Gou, Zhihong Shao, Zhuoshu Li, Ziyi Gao, Aixin Liu, Bing Xue, Bingxuan Wang, Bochao Wu, Bei Feng, Chengda Lu, Chenggang Zhao, Chengqi Deng, Chenyu Zhang, Chong Ruan, Damai Dai, Deli Chen, Dongjie Ji, Erhang Li, Fangyun Lin, Fucong Dai, Fuli Luo, Guangbo Hao, Guanting Chen, Guowei Li, H. Zhang, Han Bao, Hanwei Xu, Haocheng Wang, Honghui Ding, Huajian Xin, Huazuo Gao, Hui Qu, Hui Li, Jianzhong Guo, Jiashi Li, Jiawei Wang, Jingchang Chen, Jingyang Yuan, Junjie Qiu, Junlong Li, J. L. Cai, Jiaqi Ni, Jian Liang, Jin Chen, Kai Dong, Kai Hu, Kaige Gao, Kang Guan, Kexin Huang, Kuai Yu, Lean Wang, Lecong Zhang, Liang Zhao, Litong Wang, Liyue Zhang, Lei Xu, Leyi Xia, Mingchuan Zhang, Minghua Zhang, Minghui Tang, Meng Li, Miaojun Wang, Mingming Li, Ning Tian, Panpan Huang, Peng Zhang, Qiancheng Wang, Qinyu Chen, Qiushi Du, Ruiqi Ge, Ruisong Zhang, Ruizhe Pan, Runji Wang, R. J. Chen, R. L. Jin, Ruyi Chen, Shanghao Lu, Shangyan Zhou, Shanhuang Chen, Shengfeng Ye, Shiyu Wang, Shuiping Yu, Shunfeng Zhou, Shuting Pan, S. S. Li, Shuang Zhou, Shaoqing Wu, Shengfeng Ye, Tao Yun, Tian Pei, Tianyu Sun, T. Wang, Wangding Zeng, Wanjia Zhao, Wen Liu, Wenfeng Liang, Wenjun Gao, Wenqin Yu, Wentao Zhang, W. L. Xiao, Wei An, Xiaodong Liu, Xiaohan Wang, Xiaokang Chen, Xiaotao Nie, Xin Cheng, Xin Liu, Xin Xie, Xingchao Liu, Xinyu Yang, Xinyuan Li, Xuecheng Su, Xuheng Lin, X. Q. Li, Xiangyue Jin, Xiaojin Shen, Xiaosha Chen, Xiaowen Sun, Xiaoxiang Wang, Xinnan Song, Xinyi Zhou, Xianzu Wang, Xinxia Shan, Y. K. Li, Y. Q. Wang, Y. X. Wei, Yang Zhang, Yanhong Xu, Yao Li, Yao Zhao, Yaofeng Sun, Yaohui Wang, Yi Yu, Yichao Zhang, Yifan Shi, Yiliang Xiong, Ying He, Yishi Piao, Yisong Wang, Yixuan Tan, Yiyang Ma, Yiyuan Liu, Yongqiang Guo, Yuan Ou, Yuduan Wang, Yue Gong, Yuheng Zou, Yujia He, Yunfan Xiong, Yuxiang Luo, Yuxiang You, Yuxuan Liu, Yuyang Zhou, Y. X. Zhu, Yanhong Xu, Yanping Huang, Yaohui Li, Yi Zheng, Yuchen Zhu, Yunxian Ma, Ying Tang, Yukun Zha, Yuting Yan, Z. Z. Ren, Zehui Ren, Zhangli Sha, Zhe Fu, Zhean Xu, Zhenda Xie, Zhengyan Zhang, Zhewen Hao, Zhicheng Ma, Zhigang Yan, Zhiyu Wu, Zihui Gu, Zijia Zhu, Zijun Liu, Zilin Li, Ziwei Xie, Ziyang Song, Zizheng Pan, Zhen Huang, Zhipeng Xu, Zhongyu Zhang, Zhen ZhangJan 22, 20253905

Rapporto Tecnico Qwen2.5
Qwen2.5 Technical Report

Qwen, An Yang, Baosong Yang, Beichen Zhang, Binyuan Hui, Bo Zheng, Bowen Yu, Chengyuan Li, Dayiheng Liu, Fei Huang, Haoran Wei, Huan Lin, Jian Yang, Jianhong Tu, Jianwei Zhang, Jianxin Yang, Jiaxi Yang, Jingren Zhou, Junyang Lin, Kai Dang, Keming Lu, Keqin Bao, Kexin Yang, Le Yu, Mei Li, Mingfeng Xue, Pei Zhang, Qin Zhu, Rui Men, Runji Lin, Tianhao Li, Tingyu Xia, Xingzhang Ren, Xuancheng Ren, Yang Fan, Yang Su, Yichang Zhang, Yu Wan, Yuqiong Liu, Zeyu Cui, Zhenru Zhang, Zihan QiuDec 19, 202436411

PDF52November 12, 2024